![Synthesis of 2,4,7,9-tetraphenyl-4,4a,9,9a-tetrahydrothiopyrano[2,3-g]thiochromene-5,10(5aH,10aH)-dione and analysis of its biological activity](/upload/12631c5e396938a702bdd516ae8c4208/issues/cover/46d313f15c627c07a1f9586efd8784d2.png)
Ярославль, Ярославская область, Россия
Ярославль, Ярославская область, Россия
2,4,7,9-Tetraphenyl-4,4a,9,9a-tetrahydro-thiopyrano[2,3-g]thiocromene-5,10(5aH,10aH)-dione has been synthesised. Molecular docking with the GABAB(1) receptor was performed, and its affinity and toxicity were calculated. Computational studies were conducted using the PASS-Online programme to identify substance biological activities.
2H-thiopyranes, molecular docking, Diels–Alder heterocyclic reaction, GABAB(1) receptor, affinity, toxicity, PASS-Online
1. Mousavi-Ebadia M., Safaei-Ghomi J., Nejad M.J. Synthesis of thiopyran derivativesvia [4+2] cycloaddition reactions. RSC Adv., 2025, 15(14), 11160-11188. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1039/D5RA01222H. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YUJAHD
2. Storozhok N.M., Drulle A.Ya., Login I.Ya., Dregeris I.Ya., Khrapova N.G., Burlakova E.B. Antioxidant activity of natural and synthetic quinones. Issues of biomedical chemistry, 1995, 41(1), 16-21 (in Russian).
3. Fedorov S.N., Bode A.M., Dong Z., Radchenko O.S., Shubina L.K., Stonik V.A. Patent of the Russian Federation No. 2411229, 2011 (in Russian).
4. Ibragimova T.V. Quinones and quinoid compounds. Izv. CHGPU, ser. 2. Natural and Technical Sciences, 2020, 104-107 (in Russian).
5. Stoikov I.I., Antipin I.S., Burilov V.A., et al. Organic Chemistry in Russian Universities. Achievements of Recent Years. Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2024, 60(8), 1361-1584. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31857/S0514749224020058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070428024080013; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HDNMOL
6. Karpov I.D., Ovchinnikov K.L., Kolobov A.V. Single-reactor synthesis of 2H-thiopyranes from β aminoenones. Izv. AN, ser. chem., 2023, 72(5), 1279-1282 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-023-3902-2
7. Merkulova E.A., Kolobov A.V., Ovchinnikov K.L. A convenient synthesis of 3,4-dihydro-2H-thiopyran-2,3-dicarboxylicacid derivatives. Rus. Chem. Bull., 2019, 68(3), 606-609. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-019-2462-y. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VMISFR
8. Karakasa T., Motoki S. Chemistry of α,β-Unsaturated Thione Dimers. 2. Reactions of Thiochalcones and 2 Arylidene-1-thiotetralones with Some Olefins and the Parent Ketones of the Thiones. J. Org. Chem., 1979, 44(23), 4151-4155. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/jo01337a029.
9. Mloston G., Urbaniak K., Urbaniak P., Marko A., Linden A., Heimgartner H. First thia-Diels–Alder reactions of thiochalcones with 1,4-quinones. Beilstein J. Org. Chem., 2018, 14(1), 1834-1839. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.14.156.
10. Neese F. The ORCA program system. WIRES Comput. Molec. Sci., 2012, 2(1), 73-78. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.81.
11. Neese F., Wennmohs F., Becker U., Riplinger C. The ORCA quantum chemistry program package. J. Chem. Phys., 2020, 152, 224108. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0004608. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XTBXOU
12. Neese F. Software update: The ORCA program system – Version 6.0. WIRES Comput. Molec. Sci., 2025, 15(2). e70019. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.70019. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LUHNHP
13. Perdew J.P. Burke K., Ernzerhof M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 77(18), 3865-3868. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865.
14. Ernzerhof, M. Scuseria G.E. Assessment of the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof exchange-correlation functional. J. Chem. Phys., 1999, 110(11), 5029. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.478401.
15. Caldeweyher E., Ehlert S., Hansen A., Neugebauer H., Spicher S., Bannwarth C., Grimme S.A. Generally applicable atomic-charge dependent London dispersion correction. J. Chem. Phys., 2019, 150(15), 154122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5090222. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BTWPUZ
16. Caldeweyher E., Mewes J.M., Ehlert S., Grimme S. Extension and evaluation of the D4 London-dispersion model for periodic systems. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22(16), 8499-8512. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP00502A. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TMMTBQ
17. Weigend, F., Ahlrichs R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2005, 7(18), 3297-3305. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1039/B508541A.
18. Rappoport, D., Furche F. Property-optimized Gaussian basis sets for molecular response calculations. J. Chem. Phys., 2010, 133, 134105. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3484283. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NSKAUN
19. Rappoport, D. Property-optimized Gaussian basis sets for lanthanides. J. Chem. Phys, 2021, 155(12), 124102. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0065611. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AKVALZ
20. Neese, F., Kossmann S. Efficient Structure Optimization with Second-Order Many-Body Perturbation Theory: The RIJCOSX-MP2 Method. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2010, 6(8), 2325-2338. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/ct100199k. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OBPLML
21. Weigend, F. Accurate Coulomb-Fitting Basis Sets for H to Rn. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 2006, 8(9), 1057-1065. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1039/b515623h.
22. Goldaeva K.V. Molecular docking in medicine. Literature review. JBG, 2024, 4(26), 1-14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.60797/jbg.2024.26.6 (in Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DDMRTM
23. Agu P.C., Afiukwa C.A., Orji O.U. Molecular docking as a tool for the discovery of molecular targets of nutraceuticals in diseases management. Sci. Rep., 2023, 13(1), 13398. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40160-2. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GRNCHC
24. Aghajani J., Farnia P. Molecular Dynamic Simulations and Molecular Docking as a Potential Way for Designed New Inhibitor Drug without Resistance. Tanaffos, 2022, 21(1), 1-14.
25. Tessaro F., Scapozza L. How ‘Protein-Docking’ Translates into the New Emerging Field of Docking Small Molecules to Nucleic Acids? Molecules, 2020, 25(12), 2749. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122749. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QNBCLR
26. Bender B.J., Gahbauer S., Luttens A. A practical guide to large-scale docking. Nat. Protoc., 2021, 16(10), 4799 4832. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-021-00597-z. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MONNIZ
27. Meli R., Morris G.M., Biggin P.C. Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction using Structure-Based Deep Learning: A Review. Front. bioinform., 2022, 2, 885983. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2022.885983. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MRVTCY
28. Ong J., Kerr D.I. Clinical Potential of GABAB Receptor Modulators. CNS Drug Rev., 2005, 11(3), 317-334. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-3458.2005.tb00049.x.
29. Hvastkovs E.G., Rusling J.F. Modern Approaches to Chemical Toxicity Screening. Curr. Opin. Electrochem., 2017, 3(1), 18-22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2017.03.013.
30. Eberhardt J., Santos-Martins D., Tillack A.F., Forli S. AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python Bindings. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 2021, 61(8), 3891-3898. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00203. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DDPZDE
31. Trott O., Olson A.J. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem., 2010, 31(2), 455-461. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21334.
32. Banerjee P., Kemmler E., Dunkel M., Preissner R. ProTox 3.0: a webserver for the prediction of toxicity of chemicals. NAR, 2024, 52(1), 513–520.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae303. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GXCWJQ
33. Filimonov D.A., Lagunin A.A., Gloriozova T.A., Rudik A.V., Druzhilovskii D.S., Pogodin P.V., Poroikov V.V. Prediction of the biological activity spectra of organic compounds using the PASS online web resource. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd., 2014, 50(3), 444-457. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10593-014-1496-1. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UEKHWB
34. Seok C., Baek M., Steinegger M., Park H., Lee G.R., Won J. Accurate protein structure prediction: what comes next? Bio Design, 2021, 9(3), 47-50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.34184/kssb.2021.9.3.47. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CAVIPJ
35. Shin W.H., Lee G.R., Heo L., Lee H., Seok C. Prediction of Protein Structure and Interaction by GALAXY protein modeling programs. Bio Design, 2014, 2(1), 1-11.
36. Ko J., Park H., Heo L., Seok C. Galaxy WEB server for protein structure prediction and refinement. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40(1), 294-297. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks493.
37. Meng E.C., Polacco B.J., Babbitt P.C. Superfamily active site templates. PROTEINS, 2004, 55(4), 962-976. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20099.
38. Becker G., Berger V., Domschke G. Organicum: Practicum in organ. Chemistry in 2 volumes. Moscow : Mir, 1979, 992 p. (in Russian).
39. Cava M.P., Levinson M.I. Thionation reactions of Lawesson’s reagents. Tetrahedron, 1985, 41(22), 5061-5087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(01)96753-5
40. Pryanishnikov N.D. Practicum on organic chemistry. Moscow: State Scientific and Technical Publishing House of Chemical Literature, 1956, 244 p. (in Russian).
