from 01.01.2025 to 01.01.2024
Almfty, Kazakhstan
Almaty, Kazakhstan
California, United States of America
Almaty, Kazakhstan
JEL O14 Industrialization • Manufacturing and Service Industries • Choice of Technology
JEL O47 Empirical Studies of Economic Growth • Aggregate Productivity • Cross-Country Output Convergence
JEL C10 General
In the context of unstable foreign economic conditions, geopolitical challenges and ongoing structural transformations in the economy of Kazakhstan, a comprehensive analysis of the factors determining industrial growth and the sustainability of the manufacturing sector is of particular importance. The purpose of the study is to identify the nature, orientation and strength of the relationships between industrial production and key macroeconomic determinants, which allows us to identify priority areas of industrial policy. The empirical base of the study is based on official statistical data for 2000-2024, which ensures the representativeness and reliability of the conclusions. The methodological approach is based on correlation and trend analysis, as well as SWOT and PEST diagnostics, which made it possible to cover both quantitative and qualitative aspects of the impact of investment, export, labor and institutional components on industrial dynamics. The results of the study showed that government subsidies (correlation coefficient 0.7592), wage levels (0.7126), gross output of goods and services (0.6587) and gross accumulation (0.6552) have the greatest positive impact on industrial production. Net exports have a moderate positive correlation (0.6463), while investments in fixed assets show a weak current correlation (0.092), indicating a likely delayed effect. The SWOT analysis revealed the strengths of the industry, including a rich resource base and significant government support, as well as weaknesses related to resource dependence and technological lag. The PEST analysis confirmed the high sensitivity of the industrial sector to price and currency instability. The conclusion is made about the need for a comprehensive application of investment, fiscal and institutional instruments aimed at stimulating sustainable industrialization, accelerating technological renewal and strengthening the international competitiveness of Kazakhstan’s industry.
industrialization, macroeconomics, productivity, investments, exports, subsidies, modernization, competitiveness, diversification, sustainability
1. Artyukhov, A., Volk, I., Vasylieva, T., & Lyeonov, S. (2021). The role of the university in achieving SDGs 4 and 7: A Ukrainian case. Paper presented at the E3S Web of Conferences, 250 https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/ 202125004006
2. Baum, C. F., Hurn, S., & Otero, J. (2022). Testing for time-varying Granger causality. Stata Journal,22, 355-378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X221106403
3. Berezhnytska, U., Dobrovolska, O.,Uniiat, L., Shevchenko, A., Horiashchenko, Y., & Halaz, L. (2022). Institutional principles of intensifying the innovative development of small and medium agribusiness. Journal of Agriculture and Crops, 8(4), 275-282. https://doi.org/10.32861/jac.84.275.282
4. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Freeman, J. R., Hitt, M. P., & W. Pevehouse, J. C. (2014). Time Series Analysis for the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025287
5. Boyarko, I. M., & Samusevych, Y. V. (2011). Role of intangible assets in company’s value creation. Actual Problems of Economics, 117(3), 86-94. Retrieved from https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/bitstreamdownload/123456789/57863/5/Boiarko_Rol_nematerialnykh_aktyviv.pdf
6. Chen, Y., Xu, S., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). China’s digital economy development: incentives and challenges. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 29(2), 518-538. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.18018
7. Didenko, I., Syhyda, L., & Markauskaitė,R. (2022). Promotionof Innovative Microchip in the Market of Medical Services: MarketingAspects. Health Economics and Management Review, 3(2),86-96. https://doi.org/10.21272/hem.2022.2-10
8. Dykha, M. V., Kuzina, V., & Serdyukov, K. (2021). Grain pricing in Ukraine: A case study of malted barley. Innovative Marketing, 17(4), 26-36. https://doi. org/10.21511/im.17(4).2021.03
9. Fakhrunnas, F., Astuti, R. D., & Hendrie Anto, M. B. (2022).Determinants of non-performing financing in Indonesian Islamic banks: A regional and sectoral analysis. Banks and Bank Systems, 17(4), 72-86. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.17(4).2022.07
10. Gallo, P., Mihalcova, B., & Balogova, B (2023). Work Motivation of Social Workers in the Context of Management Innovations. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 55-63. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2023.1-05
11. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424-438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791
12. Hryhorash, O., Bocharov, D., Korneyev, M., Rudyanova, T., & Hryhorash, T. (2022). The quality of higher education and its funding in countries with different levels of socioeconomic development. Knowledge and Performance Management, 6(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.06(1).2022.05
13. Hrytsenko, P., Voronenko, V., Kovalenko, Ye., Kurman, T., Omelianenko, V. (2021). Assessmentof the development of innovation activities in the regions: Case of Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(4), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.21511/ ppm.19(4).2021.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(4).2021.07; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WFYAFQ
14. Huseynova, L., & Huseynov, A (2023). Management of International Trade in the Context of Ensuring Innovative Development. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2023.1-08
15. Iastremska, O., Strokovych, H., & Gasimov, F (2023). Relationship of Investment in Innovation and Logistics Activity in the Conditions of the Experience Economy Development. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2023.1-02
16. INSEAD & WIPO. (2012). The Global Innovation Index 2012. Stonger Innovation Linkages for Global Growth (464 p.). France, Fontainebleau.
17. INSEAD. (2011). The Global Innovation Index 2011. Accelerating Growth and Development (381 p.). France, Fontainebleau.
18. Islam, M. A., Liu, H., Khan, M. A., Reza, S. M., Yahia, Y. E., & Nasrin, L. (2018). Causal Relationship between Economic Growth, Financial Deepening, Foreign Direct Investment and Innovation: Evidence from China. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 8(8), 1086-1101. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2018.88.1086.1101
19. Kaya, H., Kwok, J. S., & LaTurner, J. (2023). Experiential Learning Through the Creation of an Investment Lab. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 7(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.7(1).16-25.2023
20. Kolodiziev, O., Telnova, H., Krupka, I., Kulchytskyy, M., & Sochynska-Sybirtseva, I. (2021).Pension assets as an investment in economic growth: The case of post-socialist countries and Ukraine. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(3), 166-174. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(3).2021.15
21. Konieva, T. (2021). The impact of financing policy on the cost of debt. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(4), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(4).2021.16 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RMMISN
22. Kozmenko, S., & Vasyl’yeva, T. (2008). Specialized innovative investment banks in Ukraine. Banks and Bank Systems, 3(1), 48-56. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 299408736_Specialized_innovative_investment_banks_in_Ukraine DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.3(1).2008.01
23. Kuzior, A., & Zozul’ak, J. (2019).Adaptation of the idea of phronesis in contemporary approach to innovation. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 27(2), 84-87. https://doi.org/10.1515/mspe-2019-0014
24. Kuzior, A., Arefieva, O., Kovalchuk, A., Brożek, P., & Tytykalo, V. (2022). Strategic guidelines for the intellectualization of human capital in the context of innovative transformation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(19) https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911937
25. Leonov, S. V., Vasylieva, T. A., & Tsyganyuk, D. L. (2012). Formalization of functional limitations in functioning of co-investment funds basing on comparative analysis of financial markets within FM CEEC. Actual Problems of Economics, 134(8), 75-85. Retrieved from https://eco-science.net/archive/2012/APE-08-2012.rar
26. Liu, K. (2023). Shanghai Stock Exchange’s Science and Technology Innovation Board: A Review. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 7(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.7(1).1-15.2023 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PCRDZJ
27. Lutkepohl, H. (2005). New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27752-1
28. Melnyk, L., Kubatko, O., Matsenko, O., Balatskyi, Y., & Serdyukov, K. (2021). Transformation of the human capital reproduction in line with industries 4.0 and 5.0. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(2), 480-494. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(2).2021.38
29. Melnyk, L., Matsenko, O., Kubatko, O., Korneyev, M., & Tulyakov, O. (2022). Additive economy and new horizons of innovative business development. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(2).2022.15
30. Moskalenko, B., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2022). The investment attractiveness of countries: Coupling between core dimensions. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 10(2), 153-172. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL10_NO2_8
31. Mtar, K., & Belazreg, W. (2021). Causal Nexus Between Innovation, Financial Development, and Economic Growth: the Case of OECD Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12, 310-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00628-2
32. Nahla, N. (2023). Universitycompany collaboration: what are the obstacles in Algeria? SocioEconomic Challenges, 7(1), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.7(1).59-64.2023 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HVOQDV
33. Njegovanović, A. (2023). Financial Evolution and Interdisciplinary Research. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 7(1), 71-95. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.7(1).71-95.2023 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SVTXVV
34. Oloveze, A. O, Ugwu, P. A., Okonkwo, R. V. O., Okeke, V. C.,Chukwuoyims, K., & Ahaiwe, E.O. (2022). Factors motivating end-users’ behavioural intention to recommend m-health innovation: multi-group analysis. Health Economics and Management Review, 3(3), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.21272/hem.2022.3-02
35. Onodugo, C., Onodugo, I., Ogbo, A., Okwo, H., & Ogbaekirigwe, C. (2021). Moderating role of social capital on the effect of financial behavior on financial inclusion. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(3), 502-512. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.41
36. Pakhnenko, O., & Kuan, Z. (2023). Ethics of Digital Innovation in Public Administration. Business Ethics and Leadership, 7(1), 113- 121. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.7(1).113-121.2023
37. Paz, B., & Fontaine, G. (2018). A Causal Mechanism of Policy Innovation. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 63, 2-19. Retrieved from https://journals.openedition.org/revestudsoc/1171?lang=en
38. Pearson, K. (1896). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution – III. Regression, heredity, and panmixia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 187, 253-318. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1896.0007
39. Pearson, K., & Filon, L. N. G. (1898). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.IV. On the probable errors of frequency constants and on theinfluence of random selection on variation and correlation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 191, 229-311. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1898.0007
40. Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., & Bahmani, S. (2018). Are innovation and financial development causative factors in economic growth? Evidence from a panel granger causality test. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 130-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.024
41. Rajbhandari, A. (2016). Vector autoregression– simulation, estimation,and inference in Stata. The Stata Blog: Not Elsewhere Classified.Retrieved from http://blog.stata.com/2016/02/18/vector-autoregressionsimulation-estimationand-inference-in-stata/
42. Rossi, B., & Wang, Y. (2019). Vector autoregressive-based Granger causality test in the presence of instabilities. Stata Journal, 19, 883-899. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X19893631
43. Samoilikova, A., & Artyukhov, A.(2023). Analysis of the relationship between “business-science” coopetition and intellectual property receipts. Socio Economic Challenges, 7(1), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.7(1).149-157.2023
44. Shapiro, S. S., & Francia, R. S. (1972). An approximate analysis of variance test for normality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 215-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10481232
45. Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance testfor normality (complete samples).Biometrika, 52, 591-611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709
46. Shkarupa, O., Vlasenko, D., Makedon, H., Bilan, S., & Serafimova, D. (2022). Economy of knowledge and transfer of innovations: Ukraine’s progress through the lens of European development trends. Knowledge and Performance Management, 6(1), 100-113. https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.06(1).2022.09
47. Skliar, I. D., & Samoilikova, A. V. (2014). Risk evaluation at enterprise innovation and investment activity financing. Actual Problems of Economics, 161(11), 173-178. Retrieved from: https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/bitstreamdownload/123456789/80841/1/Skliar_riskiness.pdf
48. Sotnyk, I. M. (2012). Trends and problems in management of production and consumption dematerialization. Actual Problems of Economics, 134(8), 62-67. Retrieved from https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/bitstreamdownload/123456789/28907/3/Sotnyk_APE.PDF
49. Soumadi, M. M. (2023). Intellectual Property and Patent Rights Protection for Innovators in Jordan. Business Ethics and Leadership, 7(1), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.7(1).12-24.2023 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FYIQRN
50. Spearman, C. E. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72-101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159
51. Stata. (n.d.a). vargranger — Pairwise Granger causality tests after var or svar. Retrieved from https://www.stata.com/manuals/tsvargranger.pdf
52. Stata. (n.d.b). correlate — Correlations of variables. Retrieved from https://www.stata.com/manuals/rcorrelate.pdf
53. Stata. (n.d.c). swilk — Shapiro – Wilk and Shapiro –Francia tests for normality. Retrieved from https://www.stata.com/manuals/rswilk.pdf
54. Stata. (n.d.d). spearman — Spearman’s and Kendall’s correlations. Retrieved from https://www.stata.com/manuals/rspearman.pdf
55. Stata. (n.d.e). var — Vector autoregressive models. Retrieved from https://www.stata.com/manuals/tsvar.pdf
56. Strielkowski, W., Samoilikova, A., Smutka, L., Civin, L., & Lieonov, S. (2022). Dominant trends in intersectoral research on funding innovation in business companies: A bibliometric analysis approach. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge,7(4) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100271
57. Vasilyeva, T. A., Leonov, S. V., & Lunyakov, O. V. (2013). Analysis of internal and external imbalances in the financial sector of Ukraine’s economy. Actual Problems of Economics, 150(12), 176-184. Retrieved from https:// ssuir.sumdu.edu.ua/bitstreamdownload/123456789/50836/5/Vasilyeva_Analysis_of_internal.pdf
58. Vasylyeva, T. A., Leonov, S. V., & Lunyakov, O. V. (2014). Countercyclical capital buffer as a macroprudential tool for regulationof the financial sector. Actual Problems of Economics, 158(8), 278-283. Retrieved from https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/bitstreamdownload/123456789/80849/1/Vasilyeva_countercyclical.pdf
59. Voznyak, H., Mulska, O., Kloba, T., & Kloba, L. (2021). Assessing and strengthening budgetary security of regions and their amalgamated hromada in an unstable economy: A case for Ukraine. Public and Municipal Finance, 10(1), 138-150. https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.10(1).2021.11
60. WIPO. (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022. What is the future of innovation driven growth? (15thed.) (89 p.). WIPO, Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2022-report
61. WIPO. (n.d.) Global Innovation Index Reports. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/series/index.jsp?id=129
62. Yu, Y. (2023). Performance Analysis of Public Investment in Chinese University Education Based on Regional Differences and Influencing Factors. Business Ethics and Leadership, 7(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.7(1).37-49.2023 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GKEZHW
63. Yu, Y., Xinxin, W., Ruoxi, L., & Tingting, Y. (2023). The MediatingRole of Human Capital in the Relationship between Education Expenditure and Science and Technology Innovation: Evidence from China. SocioEconomic Challenges, 7(1), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.7(1).129-138.2023
64. Indicators of industrial and innovative development of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2000-2024) [Electronic resource] / Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Bureau of National Statistics. — Access mode: https://stat.gov.kz/api/iblock/element/113866/file/ru /
