Omsk, Omsk, Russian Federation
VAC 5.2.5 Мировая экономика
UDK 33 Экономика. Народное хозяйство. Экономические науки
The article highlights issues related to rethinking the paradigmatic features of modern strategies for studying economics and developing a new paradigmatic vision of it. The author shows that common eclectic strategies for understanding the economy have developed within the framework of a general paradigm that was proposed by the German historical school and according to which economic entities are guided by private interests and they do not have common economic interests. The German school used a cognitive scheme: values - institutions - behavior - results.This scheme began to be used by heterodox economists, who also attracted the ideas of classical political economy, and its “truncated” versions were used by neoclassicists, neo-institutionalists and followed the Austrian school. As a result, mainstream theories are created on the basis of borrowing ideas from classical political economy, the historical school and heterodox political economy. Modern changes in political-economic thought contributed to the fact that heterodox economists formulated the Berlin Consensus, which purported to replace the Washington Consensus. The work emphasizes that in order to transition to a new cognitive paradigm, it is important to proceed, in accordance with the methodology of classical political economy, from the dual nature of economic entities as bearers of public and individual economic values and interests. On this basis, the need to recognize the state as the supreme subject of the economy, the purpose of which is to use power in the interests of the people, is justified. To describe the economic activities of the state, it is proposed to rely on a substance-activity approach to the analysis of economic, value and institutional changes occurring in the economy. The work shows the importance of using the ideas of classical political economy to study the role of public time as a unique measure of results and costs, a regulator of the interaction of subjects and the proportions of the economy. The proposed perspective focuses on the construction of fair and effective methods of regulating the economy, promoting the creation of adequate mechanisms for interaction between the real and financial sectors.
economic methodology, economic system, classical political economy, public time, state regulation of the economy, value-institutional model of the economy
1. Buzgalin A.V., Glaz'ev S.Yu. Rossiyskoe obrazovanie v oblasti ekonomicheskoy teorii: neobhodimoe obnovlenie // Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. –2022.– №5. –S. 4–21.
2. Auzan A.A., Mal'cev A.A., Kurdin A.A. Rossiyskoe ekonomicheskoe obrazovanie: obraz blizhayshego buduschego // Voprosy ekonomiki. – 2024 – № 10. – S. 5–26.
3. Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. Ekonomicheskoe obrazovanie: kachestvennoe obnovlenie neobhodimo i vozmozhno // Voprosy ekonomiki. – 2023. – №11. – S.141–160.
4. Shastitko A.E. Ekonomicheskoe obrazovanie kak zerkalo vnutridisciplinarnogo diskursa // Voprosy ekonomiki. – 2024. – № 1. – S. 137—153.
5. Avtonomov V.S. Sud'ba «bol'shih teoriy» v ekonomicheskoy nauke // Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki. – 2024. – № 1. – S. 96–105.
6. Mal'cev A.A. Petr I i mezhdisciplinarnyy sintez // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Ekonomika. – 2023. – № 2(58). – S. 3–19.
7. Stiglitz J. E. People, power, and profits: Progressive capitalism for an age of discontent. New York; London: W.W. Norton, 2019. 366 p.
8. Nekipelov A.D. Krizis v ekonomicheskoy nauke – priroda i puti preodoleniya // Vestnik Rossiyskoy Akademii nauk. – 2019. – № 1(89). – S. 24–37.
9. Hudokormov A.G. Novye dannye o «tret'em krizise» ekonomiks // Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii. – 2021. – № 1(25). – S. 103–125.
10. Rodrik D. Reimagining the global economic order // Review of Keynesian Economics.– 2024. –Vol. 12(3). – P. 396–407.
11. O`Hara F. Sovremennye principy neortodoksal'noy politicheskoy ekonomiki // Voprosy ekonomiki. – 2009. – № 12. – S. 38–57.
12. Stepin V.S. Nauchnaya racional'nost' v tehnogennoy kul'ture: tipy i istoricheskaya evolyuciya // Voprosy filosofii. – 2012. – № 5.– S. 18–25.
13. Momdzhyan K.H. Obschestvo kak institucional'naya forma suschestvovaniya social'noy real'nosti // Voprosy filosofii. – 2023. – № 4.– S. 18–28.
14. Momdzhyan K.H. Substancial'nyy podhod v teoreticheskom obschestvoznanii, ego neobhodimost' i principy // Voprosy filosofii. – 2022. – №2. – S. 71–82.
15. Granin Yu.D. «Civilizacii» – «real'nye», «voobrazhaemye» ili «konstruiruemye» soobschestva? // Voprosy filosofii. –2024. – № 2. – S. 14–24.
16. Kurz H. German and Austrian schools // H. Kurz, G. Faccarello (eds.). Handbook on the history of economic analysis. Vol. II. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016. P. 252 – 273.
17. Shmoller G. Spravedlivost' v narodnom hozyaystve. Razdelenie truda. M.: Librokom, 2012. 216 s.
18. Avtonomov V.S. Tri istochnika i tri geroya marzhinalistskoy revolyucii // Voprosy ekonomiki. – 2022.– № 7. – S. 104–122.
19. Shumpeter Y. Istoriya ekonomicheskogo analiza: per. s angl. pod red. V. S. Avtonomova, v 3-h t. T. 3. SPb.: Ekonomicheskaya shkola, 2001. 688 s.
20. Baumol' U. Chego ne znal Al'fred Marshall: vklad XX stoletiya v ekonomicheskuyu teoriyu // Voprosy ekonomiki. – 2001. – № 2. – S. 73–107.
21. Errou K.Dzh. K teorii cenovogo prisposobleniya // Teoriya firmy. SPb.: Ekonomicheskaya shkola, 1995. S. 432–447.
22. Keyns Dzh.M. Obschaya teoriya zanyatosti, procenta i deneg // Antologiya ekonomicheskoy klassiki / Sost. I. A. Stolyarov. V 2-h t. T.2. M.: Ekonov, 1993. 485 s.
23. Nort D. Instituty, institucional'nye izmeneniya i funkcionirovanie ekonomiki. M.: Fond ekonomicheskoy knigi «Nachala», 1997. 190 s.
24. Ross D. Economics is Converging with Sociology but not with Psychology // Journal of Economic Methodology. – 2022.– Vol. 30(2). – P. 135−156.
25. Kirdina-Chendler S.G. O sinteze i mezhdisciplinarnosti v ekonomicheskoy teorii: sravnenie russkoyazychnogo i angloyazychnogo diskursov // AlterEconomics. – 2023. – № 1 (20). – S. 59−78.
26. Rodrik D., Walt S. How to construct a new global order // Oxford Review of Economic Policy. – 2024. – Vol. 40(2).– P. 256–268.
27. Tolkachev S.A. Ciklicheskie zakonomernosti transformacii ekonomicheskoy ortodoksii // Terra Economicus. – 2024. – № 3 (22). – P. 6–20.
28. Gegel' G. V. F. Filosofiya prava. M.: Mysl', 1990. 524 s.
29. Aristotel'. Sochineniya v chetyreh tomah. T. 4. M.: Mysl', 1983. 830 s.
30. Marks K. Kapital. T. 1. M.: Politizdat, 1988. 891 s.
31. Biryukov V.V. Razvitie nacional'noy ekonomiki kak slozhnoy sistemy: pereosmyslenie roli gosudarstva // AlterEconomics. – 2024. – №2(21). – S. 230–252.
32. Toffler E. Metamorfozy vlasti. M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo AST», 2001. 362s.
33. Berdyaev N.A. O naznachenii cheloveka. M.: MGU, 1993. 212 s.
34. Sayer A. Moral economy as critique // New Political Economy. –2007. – Vol.12(2). – P. 261–270.
35. Mattei C. The Capital Order. How Economists Invented Austerity and Paved the Way to Fascism. University of Chicago Press, 2022. 480 p.
36. Biryukov V. V. Al'ternativnye institucional'nye strategii razrabotki monetarnyh teoriy // AlterEconomics. – 2022. – № 2 (19). – S. 262 – 282.
37. Marks K. Kapital. T. 3. Ch. 1. M.: Politizdat, 1985. 508 s.
38. Marks K. Kapital. 1986. T. 3. Ch. 2. M.: Politizdat, 1986. 1080 c.
39. Maevskiy V. Vosproizvodstvo osnovnogo kapitala i ekonomicheskaya teoriya // Voprosy ekonomiki. –2010. – № 3. – S. 65–85.
40. Suharev O. Denezhno-kreditnaya politika ekonomicheskogo rosta v Rossii: tormozyaschiy nakopitel'nyy effekt // Obschestvo i ekonomika. – 2023. – № 1. – S. 5 – 26.
41. Maevskiy V.I. O vozmozhnosti targetirovaniya ekonomicheskogo rosta: teoreticheskiy aspekt // AlterEconomics. – 2024. –№2(21). – S. 159–178.
