Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
To date, the main research on macroeconomic theory identifies five main factors of economic growth that will be decisive in the coming decades: population and human capital; capital and capital markets; globalization and trade; technology and innovation, as well as new frontiers for productivity growth. It remains an undeniable fact that innovations stimulate modern economic growth. At the same time, in the process of its evolution, any macroeconomic paradigm faces certain limitations associated with changes in the socio-economic system of society, and as a result, there is a need to rethink what are the historical prerequisites and retrospective features of the evolution of the endogenous macroeconomic theory of economic growth. The purpose of the article is to study the nature of similarities and contradictions, and the nature of the mutual influence of various macroeconomic paradigms within the framework of the evolution of the endogenous macroeconomic theory of economic growth; the roles of generalizing and separating factors that cause the emergence and development of individual elements of this macroeconomic paradigm. The scientific novelty of the article is presented by the author’s new critical view of the study of historical prerequisites and retrospective features of the evolution of individual macroeconomic theories and models of economic growth, especially the endogenous growth model, in order to show that the nature of innovation itself has an ambiguous assessment from the side of macroeconomic science.
macroeconomic theory, endogenous growth, economic growth, innovative dynamics, methodology, model
1. Aref'ev N.G., Aref'eva A.I. Ekonomicheskiy rost i idei. Moskva. Gosudarstvennyy universitet — Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki, 2010. Preprint WP12/2010/02. Seriya WP12. «Nauchnye doklady laboratorii makroekonomicheskogo analiza». https://www.hse.ru/data/2010/06/23/1220399037/WP12_2010_02f.pdf
2. Adam Smit Issledovanie o prirode i prichinah bogatstva narodov. – Socium, LKI, 2017. – 456 c.
3. Marks K. Kapital. M.: «AST», 2020. 960 s.
4. Polterovich V.M. Teoriya endogennogo ekonomicheskogo rosta i uravneniya matematicheskoy fiziki. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy associacii, №2 (34), s. 193–201, 2017.
5. Polterovich V.M., Henkin G.M. Evolyucionnaya model' vzaimodeystviya processov sozdaniya i zaimstvovaniya tehnologiy // Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody. T. 24. Vyp. 6. S. 1071—1083. 1988
6. Rikardo D. Sochineniya. T.1-3. Nachala politicheskoy ekonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniya.— M. : Gospolitizdat, 1955 .— 360s. (polnyy tekst).
7. Solou R.M. Tehnicheskoe razvitie i agregirovannaya proizvodstvennaya funkciya //The Rev. Econ. Stat. – 1957. – № 39. – S. 312–320.
8. Henkin G.M., Shananin A.A. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie shumpeterovskoy innovacionnoy dinamiki // Matematicheskoe modelirovanie. T. 26. Vyp. 8. S. 3—19. 2014
9. Sharaev Yu.V. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo rosta. Izdatel'skiy dom GU VShE. Moskva 2006
10. Shumpeter Y.A. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. – M.:«Eksmo», 2007. – S. 11–18.
11. Aghion, Philippe. «Innovation and Growth from a Schumpeterian Perspective» Revue d’économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 128(5), pages 693-711. 2018.
12. Archibugi D. and Coco A., A New indicator of technological capabilities for developed and developing countries (ArCo) // World Development. – 2004. – № 32. – p. 629–654.
13. Arrow, K., An Extension of the Basic Theorems of Classical Welfare Economics. Chapter presented at the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Berkeley, CA, pp. 565-588, 1951.
14. Barro, Robert J. «Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study,» NBER Working Papers 5698, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. 1996.
15. Cantner U. and S. Vannuccini., Elements of Schumpeterian catalytic research and innovation policy, presented at the International Schumpeter Society conference in Montreal, presented at the International Schumpeter Society conference in Montreal. 2017
16. Capdevielle M., and Natera, J.M. Innovation, absorptive capacity and growth heterogeneity: Development paths in Latin America 1970–2010. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 37: 27–42, 2016
17. Castellacci F. and Natera J.M. The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity // Research Policy. – 2013. – № 42. – p. 579–594.
18. Cowan R. and Foray D. Evolutionary economics and the counterfactual threat: on the nature and role of counterfactual history as an empirical tool in economics // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. – 2002. – № 12. – p. 539–562.
19. Edquist C. (ed.). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter Publishers/Cassell Academic, pp. 88–99, 1997
20. Fagerberg J. and Verspagen B., Innovation, growth and economic development: Have the conditions for catch-up changed? International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development 1(1): 13–33, 2007
21. Fagerberg J. Technology and international differences in growth rates // Journal of Economic Literature. – 1994. – № 32. – p. 1147–1175.
22. Freeman C. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. –London: Pinter Publishers, 1987. – 74–88 p.
23. Grossman, Gene M. «Heterogeneous workers and international trade,» Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 149(2), pages 211-245, June. 2013
24. Grupp H. and Schubert T. Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance // Research Policy. – 2010. – № 39. – p. 67–78.
25. Harrod, Roy. «International Capital Movements,» Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Economic Dynamics, chapter 9, pages 145-166, Palgrave Macmillan. 1973.
26. Howitt, Peter & Mayer-Foulkes, David. «R&D, Implementation, and Stagnation: A Schumpeterian Theory of Convergence Clubs,» Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(1), pages 147-177, February. 2005.
27. Helpman, Elhanan,. «R&D and Productivity: The International Connection». Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275633, Tel-Aviv University. Foerder Institute for Economic Research. 1998
28. Jones Charles I. Population and Ideas: A Theory of Endogenous Growth. Stanford University Economics Working Paper 97-018 Number of pages: 39 Posted: 22 Apr 1998
29. Kaldor, N. A. Memorandum on the Value Added Tax, submitted to the Committee on Turnover Taxation in July 1963, reprinted in Essays on Economic Policy, vol. I (London) pp. 266–293. 1964
30. Kim L. Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning. – MA: Harvard Business Press, 1997.
31. Kotsemir M. Measuring National Innovattion Systems efficiency – A review of DEA approach. Basic Research Program Working papers WP BRP 16/STI/2013 // National Research University Higher School of Economics. – 2013. – p. 143–167.
32. Lee H.-Y. and Park Y.-T. An international comparison of R&D efficiency: DEA approach // Asian Journal of Technology Innovation. – 2005. – № 13. – p. 207–222.
33. Lucas Robert E. Ideas and Growth. NBER Working Paper No. w14133, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1152674, June 2008
34. Lundvall B. A. National Systems of Innovation towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. – London: Pinter Publishers, 1992. – 56–72 p.
35. Malerba F., Nelson R., Orsenigo L., and Winter S. Innovation and the Evolution of Industries: History Friendly Models. – UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
36. Meacci F. (ed.). Italian Economists of the 20th Century, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 1998
37. Mirrlees, J. A. «Optimum Growth when Technology is Changing,» The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 34(1), pages 95-124. 1967.
38. Nasierowski W. and Arcelus F.J. On the efficiency of National Innovation Systems // Socio-Economic Planning Sciences an International Journal. – 2003. – № 37. – p. 215–234.
39. Nelson R.R. National Innovation Systems. – NY: Oxford University Press, 1993. – 104–113 p.
40. Ramanathan, Ram, An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis. New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 211–237, 2009
41. Ray, Subhash C. Data Envelopment Analysis. Theory and Techniques for Economics and Operations Research. – Cambridge University Press, 2004. – 177–205 p.
42. Romer P., Endogenous technological change. J. Pol. Econ. 98 (5), 71–102. Royal Society, 1985. The Public Understanding of Science. Report of a Royal Society AdHoc Group Endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society (“Bodmer Report”). Royal Society, London. de Saille, S., 2015. Dis-inviting the unruly public. Sci. Cult. 24, 99–107, 1990
43. Sala-i-Martin, Xavier. «Cross-sectional regressions and the empirics of economic growth,» European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 739-747, April. 1994.
44. Schumpeter J.A., Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Routledge, London, 1942
45. Shell, Karl. «Toward A Theory of Inventive Activity and Capital Accumulation,» Levine’s Working Paper Archive 1407, David K. Levine. 2010.
46. Smith A. «An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations». A new edition in four volumes. London, 1843, vol. I, p. 172-173
47. Solow R.M. A contribution to the theory of economic growth // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. – 1956. – № 70. – p. 65–94.
48. Steedman I. On the Marginalist Theory of ‘Capital Supply’ Metroeconomica 67(1) August 201567(1). doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12095. August 2015
49. Taylor, John B. «The Evolution of Ideas in Macroeconomics,» The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 65(2), pages 185-189, June. 1989.
50. Weel B., Soete L. and Verspagen B. Systems of Innovation, CPB Discussion Paper // CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. – 2010. – p. 215–237.
51. Whitley R.D. National Innovation Systems. / International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. – Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2001. – 323–345 p
52. Uzawa, H. «Optimal Growth in a Two-Sector Model of Capital Accumulation,» The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 31(1), pages 1-24. 1964.
53. Young L. & Stephen P. Magee. «Endogeneous Protection, Factor Returns and Resource Allocation,» The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 53(3), pages 407-419. 1986
