Odnim iz klyuchevyh faktorov uspeshnogo razvitiya v sovremennoy ekonomike stalo obladanie vysokorazvitym sub'ektnym potencialom, chto otnositsya ko vsem ee uchastnikam, v tom chisle, i k nacional'nym hozyaystvennym sistemam. Bytie sub'ektom v usloviyah glubokih tehnologicheskih sdvigov i svyazannyh s nimi masshtabnyh social'no-ekonomicheskih transformaciy predpolagaet sposobnost' adekvatno reagirovat' na izmeneniya vo vneshney srede suschestvovaniya i iniciirovat' v svoey vnutrenney srede preobrazovaniya, vnosyaschie znachimyy vklad v sovokupnye rezul'taty evolyucionnogo processa. S uchetom dostizheniy global'noy integracii ekonomicheskih otnosheniy ukazannoe obstoyatel'stvo vynuzhdaet vspomnit' o poznavatel'nom potenciale, kotorym obladaet teoriya integrirovannyh sub'ektov, voznikshaya na metodologicheskoy platforme marksistskoy politicheskoy ekonomii. Ee vozmozhnosti vostrebovany v issledovanii sub'ektnogo potenciala rossiyskoy ekonomiki kak sistemnoy celostnosti. Konceptual'noe predstavlenie rossiyskoy ekonomiki kak integrirovannogo sub'ekta pozvolyaet nayti racional'nye otvety na mnozhestvo voprosov, otnosyaschihsya k prirode, sposobu dvizheniya, reakciyam dannoy hozyaystvennoy sistemy na izmeneniya vo vneshney konkurentnoy srede. Avtor obosnovyvaet pravomernost', aktual'nost' i neobhodimost' primeneniya metodologicheskogo instrumentariya teorii integrirovannyh sub'ektov dlya analiza ryada problem, oboznachivshihsya na sovremennom etape razvitiya rossiyskoy ekonomiki. Korrektnoe ispol'zovanie takih poznavatel'nyh vozmozhnostey mozhet obespechit' potrebnosti ocenki samodvizheniya otechestvennoy ekonomiki kak sub'ektnoy celostnosti. Vmeste s tem, takoe ispol'zovanie vstrechaetsya s ogranicheniyami, obuslovlennymi deficitom opyta issledovaniy na metodologicheskoy platforme marksistskoy politicheskoy ekonomii. Osoboe vnimanie avtor obraschaet na mezhdisciplinarnyy harakter zayavlennoy nauchnoy problemy, v razrabotke kotoroy vostrebovan kompleks poznavatel'nyh vozmozhnostey, kotorymi obladayut sovremennye redakcii sistemnogo podhoda, teoriya personifikacii ekonomicheskih otnosheniy, teoriya aziatskogo sposoba proizvodstva, koncepciya neodnorodnyh ekonomicheskih sistem, institucional'naya ekonomicheskaya teoriya i dr. Avtor stremitsya k real'noy ocenke togo sozidatel'nogo potenciala, kotorym obladaet integrirovannyy sub'ekt rossiyskoy ekonomiki na sovremennom etape razvitiya.
rossiyskaya ekonomika, integrirovannye sub'ekty, personifikaciya, vlast'-sobstvennost', determinaciya, razvitie, vozmozhnosti
1. Arrigi Dzh. Dolgiy dvadcatyy vek. Den'gi, vlast' i istoki nashego vremeni / Arrigi Dzh.- M.: Territoriya buduschego, 2006. - 469 s.
2. Auriol E., Soreide T. An economic analysis of debarment // Toulouse school of economics Working paper. - 2015. - №. 599. P. - 21-32.
3. Bear J., Ezell A. (2012). Degree Mills: The Billion-Dollar Industry That Has Sold Over a Million Fake Diplomas. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.degreemills.com/preface-andintroduction- to-the-book.html (data obrascheniya 11.03.2018)
4. Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. Teoriya social'no-ekonomicheskih transformaciy. / A.V. Buzgalin, A.I. Kolganov. - M.: URSS, 2003. - 160 s.
5. Gindler G.. The Russian Method of State Suicide // The American Thinker. 11.04., 2018. - P.23-28.
6. Zubov V.M., Inozemcev V.L. Ekonomika «chudes». Pochemu gosudarstvennye kompanii tak neeffektivny? / V.M. Zubov, V.L. Inozemcev. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL:http://www.rbc.ru/opinions/ economics/28/09/2015/560923639a79472a14442d47 (data obrascheniya 15.12.2016)
7. Information Economy Report (2017). Digitalization, Trade and Development, UNCTAD, New York and Geneva, 2017 [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL:http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ier2017_en.pdf OVERVIEW (xiii) (lfnfobrascheniya 17.04.2018).
8. Kudrin A.L. Stimuliruyuschaya denezhno-kreditnaya politika: mify i real'nost'/ A.L. Kudrin // Voprosy ekonomiki. - 2015. - №5. C.15-22.
9. Matveeva L.G., Chernova O.A. Rossiyskoe importozameschenie v usloviyah «novoy normal'nosti» / L.G. Matveeva, O.A. Chernova. - Terra economicus. T. 14. №2., 2016. - C.45-53.
10. Mironov M., Zhuravskaya E. Corruption in procurement: evidence from financial transactions data // Social Science Research Network. - 2015. - [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm? abstract_id=1946806 (vremya obrascheniya: 01.02.2018).
11. Nureev R.M., Latov Yu.V. Institucional'nye ogranicheniya dogonyayuschego razvitiya imperatorskoy Rossii / R.M. Nureev, Yu.V. Latov // Ekonomicheskiy vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2007. - №2, Tom 5. C.80-99
12. Nureev R.M. Periferiya mirovogo hozyaystva / R.M. Nureev, Yu.V. Latov //Ekonomicheskiy vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2014. - №1, Tom 12. C. 123-149
13. Nureev R.M., Latov Yu.V. Ekonomicheskaya istoriya Rossii (opyt institucional'nogo analiza). / R.M. Nureev, Yu.V. Latov. - M.: KNORUS, 2016. - 268 c.
14. Ryazanov V.T. (Ne) real'nyy kapitalizm. Politekonomiya krizisa i ego posledstviya dlya mirovogo hozyaystva i Rossii. /V.T. Ryazanov. - M.: Ekonomika, 2016. - 266 c.
15. Roubini N. The unconventional truth // Project Syndicate. 03.02. -2015. - P.14-27.
16. Stiglitz J.E. Tapping the brakes: Are less active markets safer and better for the economy? // Paper prepared for presentation at Atlanta Federal Reserve Conference, April 15.- URL: https://www.frbatlanta. org/-/media/documents/news/conferences/2014/fmc
17. Surkov V. Odinochestvo polukrovki / V. Surkov // Rossiya v global'noy politike. URL: http:// globalaffairs.ru/global-processes/odinochestvo-polukrovki-14-19477 (data obrascheniya 15.12.2016)
18. Tullock G. (2003). The origin rent-seeking concept // International journal of business and economics. T. 2. № 1. -2003. - P.1-8.
19. Walliser B. (2008). Cognitive Economics. - Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. . -2008. - 246 p.
